Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3201 - 3220 of 4,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
"Outbreak Profile The CDC said Texas reported 43 people infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Enteritidis, Oklahoma reported 16 cases, Kansas 2 and Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio and Tennessee each reported 1.Nearly one-third of those sickened were hospitalized.Victims ranged in age from under one year to 79 years old, with a median age of 25. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm by John L. Welch
Applying the six non-exhaustive dilution factors of Section 43(c)(2)(B), the Board concluded that “an association exists between the parties’ marks that would impair the distinctiveness of opposer’s famous mark. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:55 am by Chris Castle
  I realize that the Silicon Valley 1% of the 1% is proudly non-union, but surely Johnson knows that “collective bargaining” is not a bunch of VCs setting a valuation. 2. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:49 am by Mandelman
”  Or, does the acronym MBS more appropriately stand for, “Mouthy-backed Sacrilege,” or perhaps, “Monetary-babbled Sacrifices? [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:40 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
[Related:  In a Florida Child Custody Case, Does It Matter That I Am Gay?] [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
 [12] It has to be noted that D2 also discloses comparative products having a V2/V1 ratio that is clearly smaller than 50% (cf. table I and example 2; PC1: 43%; PC2: 46%). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:47 am by Ronda Muir
But expenses will need to be brought under control if demand does not pick up. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 1:40 pm by Mark Bennett
This does not affect the 185th or 232nd Grand Jury which have been extended for pending investigations. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am by Leslie Sammis
It is not a violation of the state’s criminal laws for 40 a patient or primary caregiver to engage or assist in the 41 medical use of cannabis pursuant to this section, except as 42 otherwise provided in subsections (g) and (i). 43 (c)? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this regard, it is noted that the addition of such a monomer would lead to a POAC obtained from three units, one of which not being according to claim 1 of the patent in suit, so that it would not be novelty destroying. [2.1.5] D1 further does not contain any incentive to modify the particular process of example 14 by selecting two lactones according to present claim 1 as monomers for the preparation of the POAC out of the whole list given in D1, which also includes… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:20 pm
App. 337, 342-43, 142 P3d 82 (2006) (police inventory policy did not adequately limit discretion because it lacked standardized criteria or procedures regarding the scope of each inventory); Haney, 195 Ore. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
How does section 1021 of the NDAA affect this dispute? [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
How does section 1021 of the NDAA affect this dispute? [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am by John Palley
Over $1,250,000 but not over $1,500,000 $448,300, plus 43 percent of the excess of such amount over $1,250,000. [read post]