Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 6,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am
All agree, the Court says, that under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am
That day is going to be (at least) doubly eventful from a FOSS Patents perspective as the Mannheim Regional Court will hold the first Ericsson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:30 am
Haggenmacher & V. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:22 pm
United States and Victoria's Secret Direct v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
And, in case, you were wondering, it's all in taking place in English ... [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am
The Australian court is concerned because it's currently holding an extensive Samsung v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-413/99) [2002] ECR I-7091 However: Baumbast concerned people who were self-sufficient, without specifically referring to or addressing the fact. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Ansell Limited v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 8:34 am
Perrin & Nissen Ltd. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm
This Aarhus-derived provision requires member states to provide for a route for challenging decisions involving the EIA process. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
So when a Wisconsin state court lets loose with an excellent preemption decision, we figure it's worth taking a look.Blunt involved a claimed defect in a cardiac defibrillator - one of those implanted gadgets that stands by to stabilize heart rhythm (love that word, unique in the English language with more syllables than vowels) in people with chronic heart problems. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 2:16 pm
Grip-Pak, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:16 am
As far as I can see, the only English case referred to is from 1957. [read post]
