Search for: "Frank v. Frank" Results 3201 - 3220 of 6,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Franks, holding that the First Amendment protects a state employee who was fired in retaliation for his testimony in a federal criminal trial about fraud in a community college program. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Frank (06-580), raising the same issue that divided the Court 4-4 on Oct. 10 in New York City Board of Education v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
He points out that he made no actual physical contact with Franks and that he made no telephone calls, left no notes, or at any time stepped onto Franks' property. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:27 am by cdw
The Arkansas Supreme Court has stayed the execution of Frank Williams Jr. for unspecified reasons relating to the constitutionality of that state’s death penalty. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:13 pm
              "My current list includes Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank P.C. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:43 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
State, 14 So. 3d 211, 215 (Fla. 2009) (quoting Frank v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Its purpose is to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice” (Upjohn Co. v United States, 449 US at 389; see Spectrum Sys. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Winfrey 21-1466Issues: (1) Whether a law enforcement officer violates clearly established law under the Supreme Court’s decision in Franks v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” Ronald Mann reports for this blog that yesterday the justices called for additional briefing in Frank v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
Following the recent grant of cert. in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]