Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 3201 - 3220 of 4,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
Nevertheless, Products 4U registered ‘Wintersteiger’ as a Google AdWord in respect of searches carried out via the top-level domain for Germany (‘.de’). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:10 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner was typically quick and right on Twitter yesterday to draw our attention to the relevant cases: Praha v Czech Republic, and Otto v Germany, neither of which is specifically about this three-month period but rather the six-month time limit for bringing your claim to the ECtHR in the first place. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:50 am by Lorraine Fleck
Platinum Equities, 2012 ABQB 204 http://bit.ly/HIts7y Canada Post launches copyright infringement action over postal code database http://bit.ly/HGlv1U Toronto’s craft brew scene hops to life http://bit.ly/IaP892 Canada | Producer Robert Lantos sues new owner of Alliance Films over film rights sale http://bit.ly/HGjoLi Licensing dispute between Nike & Reebok ends wth Reebok pulling Tim Tebow jerseys http://bit.ly/Ior7Z7 Sports promotors are pursuing bar owners who don’t pay up for… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
  On June 25, 2003, ten-year old Blake Jermon was participating in a Camp Adventure sports program in Hanau, Germany and went to a German municipal swimming pool and almost drowned. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Open justice David Hart QC has blogged on the UKHRB on the recent decision by the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Guardian Newspapers) v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:52 am by Wessen Jazrawi
An excellent post by Helen Fenwick on the UK Constitutional Law Group blog on whether two recent decisions by the Strasbourg court, Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2), represent a move towards the appeasement of certain signatory states. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by INFORRM
For example, there was much simplistic reference to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in von Hannover v Germany 59320/00, (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [2004] ECHR 294 (24 June 2004)), without reference to the significantly narrower sequel in von Hannover v Germany (No 2) 40660/08 and 60641/08 [2012] ECHR 228 (7 February 2012) and Axel Springer AG v Germany 39954/08 [2012] ECHR 227 (7 February 2012). [read post]