Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2011, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Hart v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:16 pm
In Larue v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 am
" NovelPoint Learning LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am
Blečić v Croatia (2004) 41 EHRR 185; McCann v UK [2008] HLR 40; Cosic v Croatia App. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
The decision in Perry v Schwarzenegger has been widely reported and can be downloaded here. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:37 pm
Richard Marvin, III, et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:55 pm
CSIRO v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:43 pm
The story mentions possible copyright claims, but not trade dress, which seems odd given that the story also quotes multiple reviews noting the similarity between Bing and Kayak, including one person who simply assumed that Bing had licensed Kayak's technology. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Given its unique place in society, and the passion with which it is debated, there is much benefit to the addition of a readable, thorough legal history. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm
The federal law doesn't apply given its limited preemptive effect, so state law does, and pursuant to state law, both spouses own all the animals jointly. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 8:23 am
"Given this evidence, you can see why the trial court might well have decided that Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Given last week’s bumper crop of relists, it was perhaps unsurprising that three of Friday’s four cert. grants (or six of seven, depending how you count) came in relisted cases. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 11:27 am
The post Some Comments on Today’s Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
Lungren v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
A federal district judge in Maryland dismissed Wikimedia v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm
Statistical Sampling In Lubin v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 10:37 am
A small thought on Warhol v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
Both cases involve two pleas in law; 1) alleging breach of the principle of legal certainty and infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 [decisions of the Office shall state the reasons on which they are based]; and 2) alleging infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 [cannot register mark that it is identical or similar to the earlier mark, and is to be registered for goods or services which are not similar, where the earlier mark has a reputation and use of the mark would… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:45 am
These factors included evidence given by the group’s finance director and by KPMG and information relating to the overall financial position of the group. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
