Search for: "Goode v. State" Results 3201 - 3220 of 44,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 6:56 am by Eric Lipman
United States, and at issue is the question of whether the federal sentencing guidelines are binding or only advisory when defendants who were originally sentenced before the decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
§ 1498 (that statute has been used by private parties to establish that they cannot be held liable for infringement for any goods “used or manufactured by or for the United States”). [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
So good, in fact, that you should read it at length. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
 The post discusses a Connecticut District Court case, Charles v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 2:49 am
Citizens became playthings in the face of whimsical, arbitrary power of the state. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Karimian v Karlin  2019 NY Slip Op 05193  Decided on June 27, 2019  Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Karimian v Karlin  2019 NY Slip Op 05193  Decided on June 27, 2019  Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]