Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 44,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 6:56 am
United States, and at issue is the question of whether the federal sentencing guidelines are binding or only advisory when defendants who were originally sentenced before the decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:05 am
The post Statement on the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Moody v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:36 am
S. _ (2010); Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:19 pm
United States (IHS; Treaty Rights)Leachman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
§ 1498 (that statute has been used by private parties to establish that they cannot be held liable for infringement for any goods “used or manufactured by or for the United States”). [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
So good, in fact, that you should read it at length. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:56 am
Simply put, the State of New York ... [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
The post discusses a Connecticut District Court case, Charles v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
That was what happened in the Florida Supreme Court’s State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
United States, No. 09–6822 (Mar. 2, 2011). [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 5:10 am
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit agreed with us (in Rynearson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 2:49 am
Citizens became playthings in the face of whimsical, arbitrary power of the state. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Karimian v Karlin 2019 NY Slip Op 05193 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Karimian v Karlin 2019 NY Slip Op 05193 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is a good example. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
Spoerle v. [read post]
