Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 16,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
The court indicated its holding would "disappoint employers hoping for a means to rein in rogue employees," but it also noted that other legal remedies exist. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 8:56 pm
(Grutzmacher v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
In a new case decided Wednesday, SEC v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:35 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
The first question was whether the issue was one of substantive state law (the state of Florida), or a procedural matter under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:19 pm
In Lockheed v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:22 am
Chief Justice John Roberts cast the deciding vote, but he stated in a separate concurrence that he only went with the majority to honor the precedent set in an earlier case, Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
The result in State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
As I'll explain, I think a Scalia-authored opinion would be great news for those who are mainly concerned with the Second Amendment as a limit on federal gun control, but somewhat ambiguous news -- at least in the short term -- for those who hope for the incorporation of the Second Amendment as a check on state and municipal governments. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
Here's hoping the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
In Andrews v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
I hope he is right, but I have my doubts. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A reader recently suggested (we apologize, we seem to have lost that email) that we do a 50-state survey of where the various states stand on this subject – along the lines of the post we did in 2008 on informal interviews with treating physicians.We thought that was a good idea, although it took us more time than we had hoped to put this together. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
In particular, I hope to offer a grad student perspective in some of my future posts.Today, though, I wanted to address an entirely different topic--namely, the role of legal historians as advocates, an issue raised for me by Justice Scalia's dissent in the recent decision in Arizona v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:33 am
The United States Supreme Court (USSC) is today hearing oral arguments in Alice Corp v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 7:03 am
" Chapter 94, Note 1(h) states that "This Chapter does not cover . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
Important steps forward – Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:40 am
Glatt, et al. v. [read post]
