Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 3201 - 3220
of 182,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 4:53 pm
Congress’ experiment with establishing federal siting authority for transmission lines suffered another setback after a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision issued yesterday, February 1, 2011, vacated the Department of Energy’s (“DOE”) 2007 Transmission Congestion Study that had designated national interest electric transmission corridors in mid-Atlantic and Southwestern states. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:33 pm
To be clear, I’d prefer not hearing from those who didn’t enjoy their PR classes or didn’t like the assigned text. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:03 am
If you change the rules, you'd retrospectively undermine the past achievements, and the races would be less interesting to the general public and the betting public.I mean, why are they interesting at all? [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Better to know what's at stake than to hope that your local, state, Federal "representatives" have your best interests at heart. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
And if you’re interested, here’s my defense of the Griswold case against Robert Bork’s criticisms. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 1:12 am
JOE DAVIS WRITES THAT THE SATURDAY NEW YORK TIMES IS ALWAYS INTERESTING: I used to particularly like the sat edition back in the old 'paper' days...they would often bury stories they really didn't want to promote but felt they had to acknowledge there...so I was really interested to see how they would play yesterdays drama in congress which is hard to do without making the DEM leadership look bad but I can't find anything on the web site... [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
AT&T’s petition was approved yesterday, The Wichita Eagle reported. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 9:31 am
He told The New York Times: “Trump is an interesting person. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:12 am
To close out the week, I'm featuring a blog on an interesting niche topic, one that hasn't posted in about a month. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:15 am
In this case there are also some interesting paragraphs about the selection of the closest prior art - the Board writes "The Examining Division made an attempt to apply both criteria... but failed to do so in a convincing manner. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
So don’t worry. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:12 pm
Here are the links if you are interested: The original post (with update answering Taranto's first and second replies) Taranto's reply Taranto's second reply Althouse's final post I think Althouse has the better end of things, for what it is worth. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The reason is in the opponent’s view that the only method for the preparation of humanized antibodies disclosed in the patent is that developed by Queen et al. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:05 am
If you don’t take it, you are stuck with the deed filed in the deed records that shows you sold your mineral interest to them. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 3:33 pm
It isn't for the benefit of the people. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
Less than that and I lose interest. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:32 am
And he’s never been much of a fan. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:04 am
While the event didn't ultimately get that much press coverage, Consumer Reports did post an interesting (and disturbing) blog about it. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 11:07 pm
(there's an interesting update about David Ranck below.)Attorney "Shoeless" Tom Risivy has been complaining for some time now that the highly trained security personnel at the Coral Gables Branch Court (Motto: "We're at Christy's. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:32 am
I don't normally pay close attention to public education policy, but I was interested to see that Sen. [read post]
