Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 3201 - 3220 of 35,336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Cannon adds: “As a function of Plaintiff’s former position as President of the United States, the stigma associated with the subject seizure is in a league of its own. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am by Florian Mueller
In connection with political elections--especially in the United States--the term "comeback kid" is often used for candidates who gain momentum after a difficult start, typically in situations in which many observers thought a campaign was over before it had really begun. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:26 am by Steven Cohen
SILICA COMPANY et al – United States District Court – Middle District of Pennsylvania – August 23, 2022) involves a products liability action. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Second Circuit’s decision vacating his conviction was issued on September 20, 2017 (see United States v Brooks, 872 F3d 78, 96 [2d Cir 2017]) and this case was not commenced until September 2021. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Because state laws regularly and lawfully impose extraterritorial costs, and because a literal application of the dicta from Healy and Brown-Forman might invalidate wide swaths of standard conflict-of-laws decisionmaking, judges and commentators have searched for a narrower principle to explain the extraterritoriality cases. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 2:48 pm by Ellena Erskine
United States, they were sent on a fact-finding trip on a fishery boat in Glacier Bay. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm by Roger Parloff
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
If former President Trump commingled his personal effects with classified documents belonging to the United States, then that is not a reason to allow him to restrict use of the government's property. [read post]