Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 3,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2008, 5:50 pm
By Eric Goldman You may recall Rescuecom v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:51 am
In UMG v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:22 am
Pirelli Cable Holding NV and Others v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Court of Appeal “Where the United Kingdom had not levied corporation tax on the dividend paid by a UK subsidiary to a parent resident in The Netherlands or Italy, the UK tax authorities would not assume responsibility for eliminating double taxation. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
Las Palmas Center Associates (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1220, 1254 [reducing compensatory damages and reducing punitive damages to preserve the ratio awarded by the jury]; but see Stevens v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Levi Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Levi Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:53 am
More detail of Sakar Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:53 am
Levy, --- So.2d ----, 2008 WL 441403 (Fla. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:41 am
In Elektra v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:11 am
Pirelli Cable Holding NV and others v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 70; [2008] WLR (D) 48 “The United Kingdom tax authorities had not assumed responsibility for eliminating double taxation on the dividend paid by a UK subsidiary to a parent resident in the Netherlands or Italy in circumstances where the UK had not levied corporation tax on the dividend. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:00 pm
Cox v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:35 am
Levy, --- So.2d ----, 2008 WL 441403 (Fla. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:29 am
* Salle v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:12 am
A few months ago, in McGee v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:59 am
Levy, 2008 U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 10:57 am
Added to the mix here were charges of the most serious sort (molestation of his own brother's children in their home where he was a guest) levied against an individual with a prior criminal history. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 5:26 am
In a recent decision (Cox v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:18 am
For those of you who have access to the California Channel, you can watch the oral argument in City of Hope v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:37 am
Because of the important consumer benefits from rules that protect the ability of businesses to engage in truthful comparative advertising, Public Citizen has litigated that right over the years in a line of cases running from Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
