Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 3201 - 3220 of 5,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The threshold for issuing a form W-2 is based on dollars – nothing else matters. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Arnold J found that several uses of 'OCH Capital' infringed the registered trade marks under Article 9(1) (b), concluding that there was a 'manifest likelihood of confusion'. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 11:30 am by Michael Lowe
Once your lawyer files the Motion to Modify the EPO, the judge is required to conduct a hearing under section Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 17.292(j). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
But the coach ticket-parlor car metaphor quoted above suggests that the only thing that matters is that the employee remains in the same retirement system. 3. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
But this statement refers to content-neutral restrictions, which focus on matters unrelated to the communicative impact of the speech. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Under the current regulations, there are ten “ingredients” required for AAPs (at 41 CFR 60-300.44(a)-(j) and 41 CFR 60-741.44(a)-(j)). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:56 am by Andres
Tugendhat J therefore declared that the matter at hand “is a serious issue to be tried in each of the Claimants’ claims for misuse of private information”. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
§ 15061(b)(3) – proposed replacement of the phrase “general rule” with “common sense exemption” to employ the Supreme Court’s favored terminology. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
I think it is fair to say that Turner J was annoyed. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
I think it is fair to say that Turner J was annoyed. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
Finally, we go over to India, where the SiNApSE blog reviews the latest outbreak of yoga-based IP litigation and J. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
The United States is now on record as a formal matter of presidential policy announcing that it respects the privacy of non-citizens abroad and takes that into account when it conducts espionage; it doesn’t just disseminate and retain information about people willy nilly with no regard for the information’s importance relative to that material’s value to foreign intelligence. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:13 am by WSLL
§ 1-3-107(a)(i)(B), and if not, were Appellees entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Wyoming Rule of Civil Procedure 56? [read post]