Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Notes for C. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Today marks Popehat’s second birthday. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:29 pm
The remaining claims are intriguing, though none are a good fit to the facts. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
Arnold Schwarzenegger, defending the ban: C+. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:20 am
And as good a lawyer as he can afford to hire? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:09 am
” It’s not a good idea to allow anyone to monopolize such descriptive terms. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 4:37 am
To the extent GoDaddy intended to profit off of any such domain (or the marks contained therein) by enrolling the domain in the Parked Pages Program, GoDaddy did so in good faith…. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
” And simply because a public figure sells goods or services shouldn’t give it an advantage over public figures that don’t. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:53 pm
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is This Mark, With Disclaimer, Stylized Enough for the Principal Register? [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Mark C. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Mark C. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
It'll also provide some good grey matter exercise for me. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:54 pm
Fiduciary Law, Good Faith, and Publicness, Hillary A. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 5:47 am
Garcia C. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
There’s also resonance with the defense of overreaching C&D letters—“we have to protect our trademark! [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Sec. 33 tells us registration is prima facie evidence of exclusive right to use mark in connection w/goods. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:33 am
Are courts thinking about dilution, or is it just academics and C&D letters? [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
There is a Hillary Clinton Standard, and that’s not good for anything other than hat sales. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:34 am
The marks and goods are indeed similar when comparing Pillsbury mark as registered, i.e. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
Precedential No. 24: TTAB Affirms Genericness Refusal of "BOND-OST" for Cheese TTAB Reverses Genericness Refusal of "DIGITAL OILFIELD" for B-to-B E-Commerce ServicesOwnership:TTAB Summary Judgment: Applicant Admittedly Was Not the Owner of the Mark at FilingPhantom Mark: Precedential No. 25: TTAB Affirms Refusal of Mark Having a Phantom ElementProcedural Issues: TTABlog Practice Pointer: Failure to Answer Admission Requests May Be Harmful to Your… [read post]
