Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 3201 - 3220 of 5,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  A’lor is similarly barred from using CHARRIOL trademarks, including cable, distributing or selling products with the cable design, advertising that A’lor was or is being ‘rebranded’ or merged with CHARRIOL, and other similar commercial activities which have caused great confusion in the jewelry and luxury goods marketplace. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:36 am
Incidentally, Marty's blog has now passed the 5,000 post mark. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
In addition, `imprint’ meant `to mark by pressure (as a figure on an object or as the object itself with the figure). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:58 am
Neurons in the brain aside, should there be different criteria under Article 8(5) for "reversed" trade marks that cover identical goods where the number of competitors in an industry is limited -- or was Volvo just very creative? [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
 * EPO video-conferencing: good for the planet -- but is it good for patent applicants too? [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
‘Redskins’ marks cancelled: offensive to Native Americans http://t.co/FQcUSoOFLn -> Why do copyright infringer get away with it? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am by @travelblawg
Chocolates are good too, but I find small gift cards don’t melt as much. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
And while there are some good arguments for and against the provisions, the key is to have some answers. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
The Spain’s action gave birth to Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
"The first letter “c” in “century” is pronounced as an “s” would be, and each term is made up of three syllables. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
While the "essential function" of the trade mark in Europe is "to guarantee the identity of origin of the marked goods or services to the consumer or end user by enabling him, without any possibility of confusion, to distinguish the goods or services from others which have another origin" (Case C-206/01 Arsenal v Reed)the protection is given not to the consumer but to the trade mark owner as guarantor of the identity of… [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
So, when it comes to reputed trade marks the extended protection is actionable whenever the relevant public "makes a connection between those marks" or "establishes a link between them" [see CJEU case law in Ferrero v OHMI, C‑552/09 P, Adidas-Salomon and Adidas Benelux, C‑408/01, and Intel Corporation, C-252/07]. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
[C]ourts have refused to graft onto the adequacy standard a requirement that a package insert must include specific adverse event frequencies. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:56 am
Moreover, when the goods are identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion.Because both marks include the the designation BARTON, the marks are similar in appearance and pronunciation. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
I have recently discussed whether objections against stylised device marks containing descriptive words should be raised under Articles 7(1)(b) and/or (c) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]