Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 3201 - 3220 of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
The state of the proceedings did not therefore permit final judgment to be given, so that Mega Brands’ application to dismiss the opposition in respect of the application to register its figurative mark had to be dismissed.Says the IPKat, this is another classic example of two trivial questions -- "will Spanish people who buy toys be confused between MAGNET 4 and the MAGNEXT word and figurative marks? [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 2009 NY Slip Op 01753, Decided on March 12, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentChristine A. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:59 am
Zone Sergeant's violation of a Division of State Police regulation and bringing discredit upon the Division justifies her demotion to SergeantMatter of Revella v Felton, 60 AD3d 1184Christine A. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
It also provides representative examples of the mark as displayed on products in stores in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:58 am by christopher
My colleague and former firm mate Andrew Berger at IPBrief has written an excellent treatment of this week’s Second Circuit Decision in Chloé v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am by Alice Himsworth, Olswang.
It seems a well established legal principle that it is not for the court to mark its disapproval by depriving the claimant of that to which they are entitled. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Nelson in 1972 and last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
 In re Thomas, 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1021, 1024 (TTAB 2006) (citing Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]