Search for: "Matter of Jones" Results 3201 - 3220 of 5,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted by the Supreme Court (Lord Mance, Lady Black and Lord Lloyd-Jones) on the 22 March 2018. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:19 pm by SO Issues
Turns out there is, but good luck finding it. - I found it in a matter of seconds. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:20 am by Don Asher
Work Injuries and On-the-Job Accidents in Indiana and Illinois With Federal Law Protections: FELA, Jones Act, LHWCA, DBA; and The Jones Act vs. the Longshoreman and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act for Maritime Workers. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:29 pm by Cian Murphy
The High Court judge, Lloyd Jones J, rejected this argument. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:21 am by INFORRM
The claim was made in a blog post on the wider subject of PRs lying to the press and Hackford Jones was not directly named. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Wang
Jones and Sara Daniel, of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, and Lindsay K. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:53 am by Daniel Shaviro
Postponing a solution to fiscal problems means two things for Jones or Smith. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm by Law Lady
In support of their motion, appellants claimed that, in light of a recent opinion issued by this court clarifying the method for calculating the amount-in-controversy requirement for subject matter jurisdiction, the district court had jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
As an initial matter, it purports to allow ATF—rather than Congress—to set forth the scope of criminal prohibitions. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Jones, one of only two wins for defendants this week. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That issue was determined by the Appellate Term, 9th & 10th Judicial Districts, in [Jones] v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 6:48 am by Lauren Vodopia
In this matter, the defendant intentionally attempted to obstruct and interfere with plaintiff’s new employment by calling her place of work without her consent, bothering her employer as well as her employer’s wife, and embarrassing plaintiff by alleging that she and her employer were having an affair. [read post]