Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
See TOS ¶ 9. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Kent’s counsel, they state that they had “no difficulty in accepting that she improperly disclosed confidential information” (para. 11), that she was not candid about having done so (para. 12) and that there was an “element of cover-up” given her failure to admit what she done, instead hoping that journalist-source privilege would mean her disclosures were never revealed (para. 13). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:41 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm
In today’s case (Henneberry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:20 am
The AG concluded that Member States may exclude reproduction devices from payment of levies when an objective justification exists. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:57 am
Clarke, 2009 BCSC 1069 at para. 6. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
The European Court of Justice concluded at para.56: … the activities of the operator of the search engine [Google] and those of its establishment situated in the Member State [Google Spain] concerned are inextricably linked since the activities relating to the advertising space constitute the means of rendering the search engine at issue economically profitable and that engine is, at the same time, the means enabling those activities to be performed. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Over Google’s objections, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Over Google’s objections, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
” [¶] Where state tort law is at issue, policy considerations are best reconciled by state courts. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:41 am
¶38 NWS had gross receipts that totaled at least $47,767,795.20 from the sale of contraband Seneca cigarettes for resale in Oklahoma from August of 2006 to August of 2010. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
Saskatchewan Federation of Labour, 2013 SKCA 43, 361 D.L.R. (4 ) 132, at para. 29 and 30). [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:02 am
United States], que establece que si un usuario escribe su información personal en un sitio en la web, el gobierno puede accederla sin autorización del mismo. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
That policy stated that the subscriber information was governed by “strict confidentiality standards and policies” to keep the information secure and to ensure it is treated in accordance with PIPEDA. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
That policy stated that the subscriber information was governed by “strict confidentiality standards and policies” to keep the information secure and to ensure it is treated in accordance with PIPEDA. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am
The first was that an ISP has a legitimate interest in assisting in law enforcement relating to crimes committed using its services: para. 99. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
To the contrary, it stated that the presumption does not alter the degree of clarity that § 112, ¶2 requires. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
This issue that has been debated by copyright experts over the years because, it is argued, the destruction of an artwork may or may not have a negative impact on the reputation of the artist – the test established by Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, and mirrored in most copyright laws in the world, for claiming a violation of the artist’s right of integrity (in the context of Amar Nath Sehgal v Union of India, I commented: “destruction of a work can prejudice an… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Hemminger v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
In Mission Creek Mortgage Ltd. v. [read post]
