Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 3201 - 3220 of 18,771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 2:02 pm
  Saying that if she was (after redistricting) really representing District 2 (where she lived), then that meant that there were two people representing 2 and no one representing 6, which makes no sense.Which the Court of Appeal basically agrees with. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
  It's instead the fact that we use purported standing requirements to prevent people from challenging searches that directly target them. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am by INFORRM
“The question challenging the veracity of the respondent’s evidence of her fear, was no more than, in the vernacular, a cheap shot. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:40 am by Evan M. Levow
It also held that people are entitled to the protections of the Fifth Amendment, including the rights described in Miranda v. [read post]