Search for: "People v Trump"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 4,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2019, 9:18 am
And people are already talking about how it might be used if President Trump pardons someone in his administration for a federal crime that also happens to be a state crime. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
This was the plot of the three travel-ban proclamations issued in 2017, the last of which the Supreme Court upheld in its 2018 decision, Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
Kerner v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
The question may be: which provisions trump which? [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
To Garland, Slobodan Milošević and Donald Trump warrant the same prosecutor. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:14 pm
The court concluded that this position was consistent with the views of the Second, Fourth, and Eighth Circuits (the Second Circuit decision being the one involving then-President-Trump's blocking of some people from his Twitter account; that decision was vacated as moot by the Supreme Court, after President Trump left office), and acknowledged disagreement with the Sixth Circuit's views in Lindke v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:00 am
They aren’t the illegals Trump wants to rid from our midst. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
Last month, the Mexican Congress passed amendments to the Federal Copyright Law and the Federal Criminal Code, notionally to comply with the country's treaty obligations under Donald Trump's USMCA, the successor to NAFTA. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
Internet and Social Media The Government has added two new duties to the proposed Online Safety Bill that are aimed at protecting people against anonymous online abuse. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
“People are unobstructed. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
The only similarities between the two cases are Republicans looking out for Republicans, which is exactly what one would expect from a highly partisan ultimate veto council staffed with a majority of Republicans.The disaster that was the Trump v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
(Abbott) v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:52 am
That was an issue the Supreme Court was preparing to consider at its current term, but chose instead to send the case back to a federal appeals court after the Trump Administration had notified the Justices that it was abandoning the Obama Administration policy in favor of equal rights for transgender people. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
Potential for Supreme Court Involvement The case in question is Zarda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:35 pm
Gorsuch was also hesitant, at first, to talk about landmark cases that were mentioned by Grassley, such as Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
Potential for Supreme Court Involvement The case in question is Zarda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:35 pm
Gorsuch was also hesitant, at first, to talk about landmark cases that were mentioned by Grassley, such as Roe v. [read post]
