Search for: "People v. David" Results 3201 - 3220 of 6,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
It was announced that Barrister David Wolfe QC would chair the press regulation recognition panel constituted under the Royal Charter on Press Regulation. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
 Making that argument required a huge amount of chutzpah, given that everyone knows that liberal lawyers of the sort who populate the Obama Administration DOJ hate the leading case on expressive association, Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
 Property rights restrict what we can do with other people's property. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:05 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The relevant first-order comparison is death row v. murderers, illustrated in this post.But of course such numbers are only a rough cut. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
  He predicts that, “[e]ither way . . . , the Supreme Court’s ruling . . . could drive more people to cut the cord. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there will be an application in the case of Cartus Corporation v Atlantic Mobility Ltd Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: SRJ v Persons Unknown 11 June 2014 (Sir David Eady) Stocker v Stocker, heard 16 June 2014 (HHJ Parkes QC) Tardios v Linton, heard 17 June 2014 (HHJ Parkes QC) PNM v Times Newspapers, heard 18 June 2014 (Master of the Rolls, Jackson and Vos LJJ). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:18 am
  We enjoyed the company of real "property people" during the morning and afternoon tea-breaks, the lunch break and the Cocktail Party. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in People v Mooney that the order only ends the defendant's in-patient status. [read post]