Search for: "People v. James" Results 3201 - 3220 of 4,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 10:41 am by Orin Kerr
Because I continue to adhere to the Confrontation Clause that the People adopted, as described in Crawford v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
Campbell’s soup, James Harrison & Clare Arthurs (Manches LLP). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  Your client Gerald is accused of the drive-by shooting of four people. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm by Marc DeGirolami
  The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
(James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging) HavenCo and Sealand hitched their fates togther for a while, but the two had very different models. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Ferrer for the Southern District of Florida; Special Agent in Charge John V. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm by Sam Ritchie, ACLU
Just a few weeks after a fantastic piece outlining the struggle for marriage rights – and quoting the ACLU LGBT Project’s very own James Esseks – the New York Times today published an editorial in support of our challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, Windsor v. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Wayne, Stanford Law School; Harlan Yu, Princeton University; James Boyle, Duke Law School; Richard A. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Wayne, Stanford Law School; Harlan Yu, Princeton University; James Boyle, Duke Law School; Richard A. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by WIMS
The following two Q&As are included as an example: Question #1: Some people say that the EPA needs to do more to hold polluters accountable and protect the air and water. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am by Adam Chandler
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christine Hurt
  Well, according to the facts alleged in the complaint, there's a lot more there to hang one's partnership hat on than in Holmes v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
” As a narrow majority of the Supreme Court had explained in Garcia v. [read post]