Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 3201 - 3220 of 3,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
  The testimony was excluded not on the basis of People v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:23 am
"The New Jersey Superior Court - Appellate Division recently analyzed the applicability of the inevitable discovery principle in State v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
  On the whole, these are well-considered, well-written opinions that apply the language of the statute and the precedents of higher courts, easily within the limits in which reasonable people may differ. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
 I have written before that the Supreme Court confirmation process has become, in effect, a game. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:48 am
Apr. 28, 2009)(noting, "The Court has come across no jurisdiction that applies a contrary rule. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:37 am
That would be an interesting argument indeed, but I question whether it will carry much water in a court, before a judge or jurors, who in my experience are unsympathetic even to minor tax frauds, to say nothing of allegedly insane douchenozzles and alien lizard people. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:05 pm
In the Norfolk County Superior Court case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
But I would not lead people to rely on this Court for a review that seems to me wholly delusive. [read post]