Search for: "S W" Results 3201 - 3220 of 53,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Publication 1281, Backup Withholding on Missing and Incorrect Name/TIN(s) (PDF), contains all the information payers need to comply with backup withholding requirements.Additional resources that may help employers avoid receiving a CP2100 include the following:About General Instructions for Certain Information Returns helps you file correct Forms 1099 W-9 Saves Time and Money discusses the benefits of securing Form W-9 from service vendorsTIN Matching Video explains the… [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 8:35 am by Roger Stelk
The post Remote Real Estate Closings: Here’s What You Should Know appeared first on The Law Offices of Roger W. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:35 am
"Judge's refusal to step down after 1935 bribery conviction led to change in state Constitution; Gavin Craig said he was innocent and refused to leave the bench": The Los Angeles Times today contains an article that begins, "Justice Gavin W. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm by Tom Smith
The Republican Party has played Marley’s Ghost for the past half-dozen years, dragging behind it the sins of the foreign-policy utopians who persuaded George W. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:42 am
  According to yesterday’s Chron.com, the great state of Texas (known for giving us not only “W,” but our country’s highest rate of execution of prisoners) is not such a great place to lose all of your limbs due to a doctor’s negligence. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:19 am by Giesela Ruehl
 More information including a German abstract can be found on the publisher’s website. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm by Bystander
Bernard W has kindly sent me this link from the Daily Mail. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:00 pm by Eileen McDermott
., a case that asked the Court to consider the question “[w]hether placing stock in a blind trust satisfies [28 U.S.C.] [read post]