Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 3201 - 3220 of 41,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2023, 7:08 am by Eric Goldman
A batshit crazy concurrence questions “section 230(c)(1)’s constitutionality as applied to state defamation law” because the Constitution’s Commerce Clause power may not convey “the power to nationalize state common law defamation actions….The internet, and related e-commerce, can certainly be interstate in nature. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Ashton
This is the latest chapter in a series of cases that began with New York State Rifle Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Thus, in Cantor Fitzgerald International v Tradition (UK) Ltd [2000] RPC 95, at p.193, Mr Justice Pumfrey had before him a "certainly powerful indication" of copying whereby the arbitrary (and irrelevant) ordering of a list of variables in a piece of code was reproduced. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am by Amy Howe
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:07 am by Evan George
Then a coalition of states and environmental groups challenged the denial, and the result was the landmark decision Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Weigel
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
But then at some point, as you and others are fooled by human v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
”[5] HISTORICAL BACKGROUND An estimated 600,000 artworks were looted from Jewish people during the Nazi era.[6] The New York law defines the Nazi era as between 1933 and 1945, covering coercively exchanged property from the start of Hitler’s rise to power to the end of World War II. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  As they note, there were only six states with bans last year when New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:01 pm by Gerard Magliocca
This letter was quoted by the Supreme Court in Perry v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:47 am by Ekaterina Pannebakker
HvJ EU 24 november 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:923, NIPR 2022-549 (Tilman/Unilever) / p. 51-58 Abstract Tilman v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am by Michael C. Dorf
Such a lawsuit could concede that notwithstanding the Supreme Court's invalidation of the Line Item Veto Act in Clinton v. [read post]