Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 4,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 5:18 pm
Circuit Court, in an opinion that is now being challenged in the Supreme Court in Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:43 pm
Bush v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:03 pm
Jammie Thomas Conservative Think Tank: RIAA v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
In 2006, President Bush signed a bill reauthorizing the provision for another 25 years. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(in support of petitioner) Brief amicus curiae of the United States (recommending certiorari be granted) Docket: 08-1175 Title: Florida v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:09 am
Nearly two weeks have passed since the Department of Justice filed a controversial brief in Smelt v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 4:42 pm
In Kitzmiller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:16 am
On Thursday, the Justices are scheduled to examine in their private Conference the case of Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
In his dissent in Gross v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
Bush, Bill Clinton and Condoleezza Rice. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Bush has no power to order the release of prisoners held by the Executive for seven years, where the Executive detention is indefinite and without authorization in law, and release into the continental United States is the only possible effective remedy. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
New York, and Bush v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:01 pm
In my latest FindLaw column, I pile on the Obama Justice Department for its wretched brief in Smelt v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:40 am
If hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue, then the felt need of authoritarians and totalitarians over the last century or so to make false claims of democratic legitimacy at least reveals a modern supposition that popular support is necessary to legitimate state power. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 1:36 am
On June 11th, the Department of Justice filed a brief on why Smelt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
A federal judge threw out the case after the Bush Administration invoked the “state serets privilege. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., Sugawara v. [read post]
