Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 3201 - 3220 of 6,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Ba ba ba, bye BabybelFromageries Bel v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (December 2019)Fact of the day: I don’t like cheese (you could say I’m not fondue it). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 May 2006, 9:02 am
The following two decisions raise what I think are interesting, if not common, issues.In Lakeview Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by Barry Sookman
We’re about to find out” https://t.co/NF6sryTlHb -> CJEU Advocate General Opines on the ‘Legitimate Interest’ Concept – Alison Knight https://t.co/wpKz7w2O20 -> CPIP Founders File Amicus Brief on Behalf of 11 Law Professors in Converse v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice http://t.co/WxpKIS9o3n -> Life on the Social Media Front Line: The legal and ethical challenges facing Online Community Managers http://t.co/YD8WpEJJZj -> eBay Not Liable for Technical Glitch When Seller Doesn't Set Reserve Price — D'Agostino v. eBay http://t.co/2epESgQmu0 -> Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:16 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
However, in such a case, it would be better practice to use terms like “Seller”, “Lessor” etc than to use such confusing expressions.]July 97           Real made a reference to Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. [read post]