Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 3201 - 3220 of 10,139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 4:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Under the plain language of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and Const 1963 art 1 § 6, the right to keep and bear arms involves the right to use firearms in self-defense. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015)The history of the United States has been, if nothing else, a history of tremendous battles over the definition and control of the societal structures that define and discipline its politics, law, and culture--its sense of self as a polity and community. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The short answer is that it would not because there exists a mechanism identified by the Strasbourg court in KRS to ensure that his Article 3 rights are not infringed by the requesting state. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 8:42 am by Ezra Rosser
In this short paper, we focus on the legal needs of low-income consumers and the potential of LLMs to increase their access to the court system in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Larry Ribstein
In so doing, it pays short shrift to the United States’ interest in remedying frauds that transpire on American soil or harm American citizens, as well as to the accumulated wisdom and experience of the lower courts. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 3:35 pm by Mark Litwak
Mills, chief judge of the United States District Court Northern District of Mississippi, found in favor of Sony and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:15 pm by Georgialee Lang
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 9:44 pm by Georgialee Lang
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial or hearing where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]