Search for: "State v Locke" Results 3201 - 3220 of 3,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 10:32 am by John Richards
As mentioned earlier, the Supreme Court, in the 2010 case of Graham v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Subsequent attempts to annul this decision to refuse disclosure were successful (Case C-64/05 Sweden v Commission [2007] ECR I-11389) and subsequently some of the documents were disclosed. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am by SHG
  There will be law on the internet, and that law will be dictated by the United States of America. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
It was unclear if she received that email and she had periodically been locked out of the email system. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am by Charon QC
  The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
Even if it were not implicitly disclosed in D1, this feature was considered to be known in the state of the art as exemplified by D3.2.2 The appellant contested the findings of the examining division in the statement of the grounds of appeal. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:13 am by Susan Brenner
[She] told Swoyer she had not given her password to anyone, and stated that she always locked her computer when she walked away from a terminal. . . . [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  Only in one instance have the Plaintiffs possibly stated a colorable claim. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Instead, they are sealed up, and locked away in a special safe, under a longstanding practice discussed and explained in a recent case. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
Time will tell.For those interested in parody and all things locked in the 1970s can I recommend writer and designer Richard Littler's Scarfolk Council's facebook pages - the collection of erotic, submissive Christian/religious albums is an eye opener. [read post]