Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 4,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 3:49 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
As Muhammad confirmed, the applicable test is that in Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
The panel I moderated that day in April 2008 had panelists: Barbara Rodriguez Mundell, Presiding Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Maurice Portley, Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Pendleton Gaines, Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Dan McAuliffe, State Bar President Ed Novak, State Bar President-Elect That’s a great group of folks to sit around and talk about anything. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
But in a decision handed down yesterday, a New York state appeals court ruled in favor of Simkin. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Blue Shield of California, 189 Cal.App.4th 1117 (Nov. 5, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) stated without analysis that a UCL "fraudulent" prong claim predicated on an omission (as opposed to an affirmative misrepresentation) does not lie absent a duty to disclose. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm
In MKJA, Inc. v. 123 Fit Franchising, LLC (January 4, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) considered whther a trial court properly lifted a stay of litigation that had been imposed pursuant to section 1281.4, on the ground that the plaintiffs could not afford to pay the costs associated with arbitration. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Beckerman, 126 AD2d 591 (2d Dept 1987), and Muller v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:01 am
This, however, presented a question of credibility, which the Board was free to resolve against troopers and the court declined to substitute its judgment for that of the Board and the Superintendent.The Appellate Division said that the test applied [i]n assessing whether an administrative decision is supported by substantial evidence is whether the finding is supported by the type of evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support the conclusion… [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
It is initiated in the Common Pleas Court usually in the Domestic Relations Division. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:59 am
Now I confess that I publish this with great trepidation, since I appear before this appellate court from time to time. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Novo appealed and the Federal Circuit reversed and vacated the district court’s judgment in a 2-1 decision. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Rongiger sued then State Comptroller H. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
See Houston Court of Appeals Says Ledbetter Act Applies to Texas State Law Claims. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:18 am
State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:22 am
The district disagreed and refused to pay him for his unused leave credits.The absence of a statement providing for the cash liquidation of leave credits proved to be one of a number of critical elements in the Appellate Division’s resolution of his appeal from a Supreme Court judge’s summarily dismissing his complaint.The Appellate Division said that “[i]n the absence of a statutory or contractual basis for recovery, a public employee… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:53 pm
App. 783 (1990) the Washington Court of Appeals used the common dictionary definition of “prescribed” from Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 1792 (1966). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:15 pm
A128782 COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE 189 Cal. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. [read post]
