Search for: "State v. Gross" Results 3201 - 3220 of 4,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2018, 12:11 am by Florian Mueller
I'm so grateful for the great support I've received from Google that I won't comment publicly on Oracle v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire,… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am by Máiréad Enright
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
It would be hard to find a business dissolution case with messier facts and thornier legal issues than Tal v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Kavanaugh has not ruled directly on the validity of Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Edward T. Kang
Rule 408 Precludes Some Settlement Evidence From Being Admitted The Federal Rule of Evidence 408 is the model for many state court rules. [read post]