Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 4,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2013, 1:45 am
A copy of the Court’s opinion in American Express Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:19 am
(footnote omitted).For a more recent reiteration of that same rule, see People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 am
While this constitutes a significant opportunity cost to OPPO, Nokia has multiple problems with the state of affairs:Each time Nokia releases its quarterly numbers, it has to justify the impact of non-renewals. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:55 pm
The Supreme Court laid out the basic test in 1984 in a case called Strickland v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:50 am
In Beaumont-Jacques v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:01 am
That's the basis on which he distinguishes cases like Huawei v. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 10:49 am
United States — we argue that tracking individuals in the way that this technology does is something the government cannot do without a warrant. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:47 pm
After the original version of the Apple v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 10:10 pm
Daimler, and now also Nokia v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:21 pm
Here, for instance, is the view of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Van Orden v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
There are a number of potential reasons why administrators are so quick to call in the police. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:54 pm
Apple v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Case v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
Quick links Sari Savela, Christian Network Europe: Freedom of religion is also for atheists: on the centenary of Finland’s Freedom of Religion Act. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
Nike went after one end user for ordering Chinese counterfeit trainers via the Internet: EWPCC summary judgement in Nike v E Bateman (IP Dragon) Crosstown Music bitten by partial assignment of copyright: EWCA decision in Crosstown v Rive Droite & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Possibility of obtaining summary judgment in patent cases: Patents Court decision in Virgin Atlantic v Delta (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keeping down the price of copyright justice (1709 Blog) United… [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
