Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 3201 - 3220 of 71,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 11:52 am by Ilya Somin
These two justices have long held the view that the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over state vs. state cases is mandatory, not discretionary. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Set aside for now whether such a mandate is good policy, whether it's consistent with the First Amendment, and whether it's consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause.[1] Is such a state law preempted by § 230(c)(2)? [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Kyle C. Velte
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 2:13 pm by Ralf Michaels
Like the applicants in the case of Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy, Ms Valdís Glódís Fjölnisdóttir and Ms Eydís Rós Glódís Agnarsdóttir are not biologically linked to their child, who was born in California. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 11:04 am by Giles Peaker
There was no EPC requirement for a valid s.21. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Soojin Jeong
Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 8:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
[A] divided panel of this court [then] found that Officer Doe's complaint had stated a cause of action under Louisiana law against Mckesson. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:34 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Alito's dissent in California correctly stated the framework from Allen v. [read post]