Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 14,816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2007, 9:41 am
Davidson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:40 am
Hinshaw v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
* Courts have also vacated an arbitration award where it is determined that the award “violated strong public policy. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
The Federal Circuit used strong language in affirming the decision of the Veterans Court. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:12 am
In Mason v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:31 am
On Monday, in Tapia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm
Clause 3.2 stated they they would not publish, in any jurisdiction, any articles or statements which “refer to” Mr Mionis or his “immediate family”. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
State, 358 So. 2d 401, 403 (Miss.1978) In Roland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:58 am
Strachan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:03 pm
See Winterberg v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:20 am
United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), but like the monster in a formula horror movie it springs back to life and attacks again. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 8:55 pm
The controversial condition of polygraph testing as a component of sex offender mental health treatment had been approved by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
