Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 2:20 pm
” Von Spakovsky further argues that Section 5 is not needed because “[t]here is nothing that prevents anyone, black or white, from registering and voting. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Jim Dempsey identified deficits in corporate compliance with cybersecurity protocols and the imperative of upgrading enforcement mechanisms to protect consumers. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:28 pm
In Damasco v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
As president, however, Trump is indeed the top intelligence dog and the very consumer that the system is designed to best serve; withholding requested intelligence from him is odd. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:14 am
Don’t you? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
Inc., v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
VidAngel’s Service As the Ninth Circuit explained, VidAngel offers over 2,500 film and television episodes to consumers. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation iMedia Ethics has looked why BuzzFeed published the Trump Dossier, and why others didn’t. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
Haviland Hughes, the lead plaintiffs’ counsel, knows how to litigate cases against pharmaceutical companies; last year they cleaned up with similar unfair trade practices and consumer protection claims against a variety of drug companies arising from overcharging of state Medicaid / Medicare funds. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
Bad things happen when we develop an orthodoxy that content doesn’t deserve to exist even though the First Amendment protects it. * Salsoul v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:14 am
Following the first world war the US subsidiary was confiscated and set up as an independent business, eventually coming to operate as Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) outside the US. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
The case raises issues of such significance to copyright holders and online service providers that it may well end up as a landmark precedent of the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 12:24 pm
Barney Frank’s “Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009” (H.R. 4173) is mostly famous for creating a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, it would also “put the FTC on steroids,” in the words of Jim Miller, FTC Chairman from 1981 to 1985. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm
Certainly not the consumers of legal services or the bar either for that matter. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
Barr, 18-663Issue: Whether prohibiting interstate handgun sales, facially or as applied to consumers whose home jurisdictions authorize such transactions, violates the Second Amendment and the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:36 pm
See KP Permanent Make-Up Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:03 pm
The workers’ compensation insurance program's legislative intent was to pass the cost of injuries and accidents to the consumers of products and services and not to general taxpayers. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:06 am
For example, the Court’s AT&T v Concepcion decision creates significant new obstacles to class action suits, upholding arbitration clauses that curtail consumers’ ability to join together to pursue individually small (but, collectively large) claims against corporations. [read post]
