Search for: "US v. Green"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 6,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:19 am
Relying on Mustapha v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:56 am
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in a recent landmark decision, Lohé Issa Konaté v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
Green. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 12:37 pm
And I am not posting this here for some idiot to use it to harass or anything else. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
" Romano v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
OHMI (Class 46) TOPCOM : Likelihood of confusion: Häfele v OHIM – Topcom Europe (Class 46) EXECUTIVE EDITION can be freely used: BSH v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am
Green of Beachwood, L.P., 2015-Ohio-1193 (The purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate a plaintiff, but to punish and deter certain conduct, quoting Moskovitz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
When Congress enacted AC21, it added two provisions promoting “job flexibility” for long-delayed adjustment of status (green card) applicants. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
Green. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
This show first aired in the US in 2010 and was subsequently broadcast in the UK in 2011. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:50 am
(The Court similarly left this issue unresolved a decade ago in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
One filing v. three, we also felt that there were some things left unsaid, in part b/c at the hearings proponents were given a lot of opportunity to explain their cases, so we ran out of time. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Yoder, 406 US. 205 (1972); James D. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:34 am
Village Green of Beachwood, L.P., et al, 2013-0586. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 11:59 pm
In Chong v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
He then proceeds to emphasize those details so thoroughly, it appears the Court may be ruling small, and not reaching a larger question: Whether it will use the case to overrule a key foundation of public-sector unionism, Abood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
In considering section 91, the High Court stressed that every case is fact sensitive, so previous decisions are not greatly useful. [read post]
