Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 3201 - 3220 of 3,531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 12:51 pm
United States (extending Belton to all “recent occupants” of a vehicle) should be abandoned in favor of the rule that the majority ultimately adopts in its opinion. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:29 am
The argument in Safford United School District v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:38 am
David O'Neil, Assistant to the Solicitor, will argue for 10 minutes for United States as amicus curiae supporting reversal. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
The Supreme Court of Illyria, mirabile dictu, displays an uncanny resemblance to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:02 pm
Justice Souter filed a brief concurrence, printed here in its entirety: I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:50 pm
United States Docket Filing | Questions Presented Case Number: 07-10441 On Appeal From: USCA-3 Date Argued: January 21, 2009 Date Decided: April 6, 2009 5-4; Vacated and Remanded Majority: Souter(m), Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent: Alito(d), Roberts, Scalia, Thomas Days between argument and opinion: 75 (42) United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 8:15 am
Today's second and final ruling issued in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
United States, the Supreme Court wrestled with how to make sense of what went on behind closed doors in a jury deliberation that produced several acquittals but also deadlocked on other factually related counts. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus responded by referring to a Fifth Circuit case (United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
Breyer commented dryly that “I saw this film, and it is not a musical comedy. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Watson (08-6261), asking whether  prosecution for criminal contempt of a congressionally created court must be done in the name of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:22 am
Stanford student John Dalton discusses last week’s oral argument in No. 08-5274, Dean v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court ordinarily rejects criminal cases for review absent a material split of opinions in the state appellate courts, federal appellate courts, or both, unless the Court finds a compelling Constitutional question to justify review nonetheless. [read post]