Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 5,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
United States (1879). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:15 am
The potential employee had earned a Bachelor of Science degree, as well as a certificate in Business Management and Marketing from a United States university. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
See See v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Since a number of religious groups previously absent from the United States have recently immigrated to the United States (often due to persecution in their traditional homelands), the number of potential conflicts has gone up. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
In the United States the protection of three-dimensional marks falls under trade dress (defined in 15 USC 1127), and is more mailable than legislation applying purely to registered trademarks. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Under state (WA) law, the defendant had to maintain a Dairy Nutrient Management Plan (DNMP) which had been approved and updated over the years. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
” King apparently agreed, as other correspondence shows that Daves actively licensed King’s work around the world, administered royalties, and fielded permission requests for reprints and translations. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
At Monday’s oral arguments in ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:26 am
United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:13 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:49 pm
See buySAFE, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:39 pm
What does violate the Constitution is approving the enforcement of a sentencing statute that does not “give a person of ordinarily intelligence fair notice” of its reach, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am
It has now been confirmed that two companies in the United States have potentially been the subject of cyber-terrorism. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:38 am
Background ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
Ethical issues can impact examination, for example in trying to amend claims to exclude unethical matter (see for example decision T1441/13which shows the difficulties of disclaiming certain embryo stem cells).However for the moment the uncertainties we have in Europe in patenting biotech inventions are dwarfed by the tremendous uncertainty created in the US by the Supreme Court decisions Mayoand Myriadand the fact that Guidanceissued from United States Patent and Trademark Office… [read post]
