Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:43 am
 In GMAC LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989), the United States Supreme Court held that in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
Case(s) in which the Solicitor General has recently filed a brief for the United States, as directed by the Court: Docket: 08-1191 Title: Morrison v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
(Konop v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am
As the two largest consumers and producers of energy, there can be no solution to this challenge without the efforts of both China and the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 4:21 am
(Union Pacific) appealed from the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene in an action brought by Plaintiffs-Appellees (United States and the State of Oklahoma) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
App. at 553) The general rule throughout the United States is that an officer of a corporation who takes part in the commission of a tort of gross negligence or reckless indifference by the corporation may be personally liable. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear two Michigan habeas corpus cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19] Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court found in the 1990 case of Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
The case follows another recent related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 9:40 am
This post is about the Supreme Court of Michigan’s decision in People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:34 pm
Because they were nontestimonial, their admission did not violate the Confrontation Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Those lawyers-Texas solo Dan Perez and Michigan-based Patrick Anderson, both of whom frequently work for Spangenberg and his patent companies-quickly hammered out the $4.2 million settlement. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
In Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
Moreover, this question already was addressed in United States v. [read post]
