Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 3201 - 3220 of 4,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Rusty Shackleford
What the future holds for the Death Penalty in the United States is uncertain. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:42 am by Susan Brenner
On May 2, 2008, the Director of Security for FPL advised United States Secret Service agents `that an individual, without authorization, accessed the `GEXA Energy' . . . system in Houston. . . . [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm by John Elwood
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
We got it because someone in Nigeria respected, trusted, and cared enough for the safety of the United States to walk into our Embassy and alert officials there to what his son might do. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm by Anna Christensen
Two justices, Justices Stevens and Alito, do not participate in the cert. pool. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:37 am
Steven Geoffrey Gieseler is reporting today for the American Thinker online that the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to a case coming from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals that deals with the nation's eminent domain laws. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am by Lawrence Solum
The key is instead what relationship a right must bear to “citizens of the United States” in order to count - that is, the meaning of “of. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:19 pm by CSL Library News
The first case to be tried under the new law was United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm by Matt Sundquist
" Fantasyscotus.net continues to generate attention, and this weekend Josh Blackman analyzes the predications for the outcome of Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
The key is instead what relationship a right must bear to “citizens of the United States” in order to count - that is, the meaning of “of. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]