Search for: "University Oral "
Results 3201 - 3220
of 6,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2019, 1:59 pm
The University of Toronto has wisely submitted that “The effect of the extreme delay in the present case raises a series of issues that merit full, transparent and detailed review, with input from any affected party, before a final decision regarding the tariffs is made. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:09 am
John's University School of Law, New York was also interested in drawing drawing on strengths from the two systems.Tailpiece: If you like the TTAB, you'll just love John L. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Howrey Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:00 pm
A Systematic Review of the Evidence," Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Online First, 5 April 2018Law Reviews"How to End 'Illegal Immigration'," Maryland Journal of International Law, vol. 33, no. 1 (2018)"The Perpetual 'Invasion': Past as Prologue in Constitutional Immigration Law," Roger Williams University Law Review, vol. 23 (Forthcoming, 2018)"Refugees in the European Union: The Harsh Reality of the Dublin Regulation,"… [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
In this column, I will consider some of the interesting lines of argument in this case that captured the Justices’ attention during oral argument. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
Duffy, George Washington University [PDF Version of this Post] In re Nuijten, which is being argued to the Federal Circuit today, presents the important issue of whether a new type of artificially constructed signal may be patented. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
By extension, the character of the dealing factor must be carefully applied in the university context, where dealings conducted by larger universities on behalf of their students could lead to findings of unfairness when compared to smaller universities. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
Universal Manufacturing Co. for support. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
The PP explained that it was relevant because it showed that the Rockefeller University and Broad Institute had come to an agreement that Rockefeller had no rights to the opposed patent. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
For major decisions, they should do so in writing; for minor or routine ones, a checklist or oral statement could suffice. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School and the principal author of The Oxford Introductions to U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:32 am
Monette is Professor of Law and Director of the Great Lakes Indian Law Center at the University of Wisconsin Law School. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:29 pm
He is also Research Investigator and Adjunct Professor at the University of Michigan School of Information. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
Yale University Press will publish his next book, which is entitled Friend of the Court: On the Front Lines with the First Amendment (2013). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
Donna Nagy of the Indiana University's Maurer School of Law now offers the following perspective on the Respondent's argument: Thanks Gordon for providing the opportunity to follow-up on my prior post with thoughts on the Respondents’ oral arguments. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
The following essay for our series on John Paul Stevens is by George Rutherglen, a law professor at the University of Virginia. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:30 am
by Melbourne Journal of International Law [Jean d'Aspremont is Associate Professor of International Law and Senior Research Fellow of the Amsterdam Center for International Law at the University of Amsterdam] Brad Roth's timely and insightful article entitled 'Secessions, Coups and the International Rule of Law: Assessing the Decline of the Effective Control Doctrine' published in the Melbourne Journal of International Law deserves the greatest attention. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Rotunda is The Doy & Dee Henley Chair and Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence, Chapman University, The Dale E. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:31 pm
The Circuit Court indicated that it would at least keep the case before it until it holds oral argument on the new questions on November 13 in a federal courthouse in Austin. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:39 am
Nunn Center for Oral History at the University of Kentucky. [read post]
