Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3201 - 3220
of 4,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2019, 7:51 pm
One offers some assurance that her decision today on x will not be read as a decision tomorrow on y. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Rather the forensic description in simple words that leave little room for misinterpretation and the acceptance that x does not have to be expressed as similar to y but is simply x. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 1:53 am
Tell those who do call get that you filed a Chapter 7 on date x, and the bk number is y. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:46 am
A typical modification clause says something like this: Upon the affirmative vote of holders of not less than X% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, the issuer may modify, amend, or supplement the terms of the Bonds; provided, however, that no such action may, without the consent of holders X+Y% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, reduce the principal amount of any Bond. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:38 pm
I can vouch for having given dozens of workshops at law schools where no discussion of panel data techniques and description of what exactly fixed effects control for is sufficient to respond to the “but did you control for X, Y and Z” question. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 6:00 pm
The X axis shows years of monopoly that the innovator has obtained in each instance while the Y axis shows the number of years away from Marketing authorisation. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
Suppose instead that we eliminated charitable deductions and gave each adult U.S. citizen the right to allocate $X in federal money to the charity of his or her choice (with criminal penalties for selling the right). [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
At least not in a classic ROI (return on investment) calculation where if I spend X dollars on this initiative it will bring Y dollars in new business to the firm. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 2:05 am
But job postings on LinkedIn and other sites popular with Generations X and Y aren’t guaranteed to reach this younger group. [read post]
26 May 2007, 9:45 am
(I will not elaborate on this range here; I discuss them in a couple of earlier articles - in my review of The Limits of International Law, and in my review of Slaughter's A New World Order.)Now imagine a vertical Y axis, representing a range of methodological positions with prescriptivism at the top, above the X axis, and descriptivism on the bottom. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
On the other hand, the public just loves policy [Y], so we're gonna stick with that, even though we all know it's an inferior position. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:05 am
It also may work somewhat as Gingrich suggests, with the third branch taking sides to determine the winner: Imagine the Court invalidates Statute X and Congress attempts to override the decision by enacting Statute Y, which is identical to Statute X, containing a finding of how the Court's prior decision was wrong; the success of that override effort would depend on which side the president takes and whether he will sign and enforce the overriding legislation. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm
It seems to me that one predictable consequence of the proposed “slider” option–a much more blunt form of decision-making–could be a systematic shift away from privacy protection, as users decide that the cost of losing control over information x is worth it in order to ensure that information y, now bundled in the slider with information x, is widely available. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:23 am
The people that aren't may find instant anachronisms - mentioning X new business when X is already merged into Y, how slow! [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Moreover, the value was indirectly derivable from the plotted points in Figure 2 at the position x = LaB6 /(LaB6 + ITO) = 0.06 which agreed with the proposed value of 0.09 for the hexaboride concentration, but not with alternative values of “0.08” or even “0.05”. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 2:15 pm
Professors may favor policy X in one context, but policy Y in another, even if those positions are hard to reconcile. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Under SEC rules, where the parent guarantees the debt, the subsidiary is exempt from ongoing SEC reporting (in accordance with Rule 12h-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), and the parent reporting company is not required to provide separate financial statements to the SEC for the subsidiary (in accordance with the exemption under Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X). [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:46 pm
And here’s the President’s two penn’orth (X Y & X and Brian Morgan [2011] EWHC 1157 (Fam)). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:37 am
App’x 327, 329 (2d Cir.2009) (concluding that the district court “properly compelled arbitration on the question of the arbitrability of class claims under the Settlement Agreement[,]” citing Bazzle and Howsam); JSC Surgutneftegaz v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
ditions Y. [read post]
