Search for: ""fair use""
Results 3221 - 3240
of 10,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 11:06 am
King, Chief Legal Officer, Avvo, Inc.Rebecca Tushnet, Professor of Law, Georgetown Law SchoolModerators: Chris Beall, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP and Bruce Johnson, Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBrand Journalism, Sponsored Content and the First AmendmentDifficult issues involving rights of publicity, copyright fair use and consumer protection disclosures arise in the First Amendment No Man’s Land between obvious commercial advertising and editorial speech by… [read post]
18 May 2016, 10:46 am
Now Oracle may seek up to $9 billion in damages, while Google is arguing that its use of the 37 APIs in question constitutes "fair use. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:42 am
That's the question posed by the following ad (HT Zach Schrag):"Turo is like Airbnb, but for real people's cars" -- USA Today, quoted in ad for TuroThis snowclone is common in (often mocking) descriptions of Silicon Valley elevator pitches, but what about use in an actual ad? [read post]
18 May 2016, 12:25 am
Oracle's lawyers argue (and I agree) that, after the close of Google's "fair use" case, no reasonable jury could conclude that the way Android hijacked Java constitutes "fair use".I can't comment on it until much later today, but I did want to publish this important motion immediately. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:43 am
Now Oracle may seek up to $9 billion in damages, while Google is arguing that its use of the 37 APIs constitutes "fair use. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:28 pm
A fair use doesn’t require permission from the copyright holder, or a fee. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:45 pm
Now Oracle may seek up to $9 billion in damages, while Google is arguing that its use of the 37 APIs constitutes "fair use. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:10 pm
Now Oracle may seek up to $9 billion in damages, while Google is arguing that its use of the 37 APIs constitutes "fair use. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:10 am
Now Oracle may seek up to $9 billion in damages, while Google is arguing that its use of the 37 APIs constitutes "fair use. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:14 am
Acuff-Rose, 510 U.S. 569 (1994), another case that dealt with a song parody as a form of “fair use”). [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:49 am
Fair Use makes a huge difference. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:06 pm
YouTube knows full well there is almost never “fair use” for full tracks and albums. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:06 pm
YouTube knows full well there is almost never “fair use” for full tracks and albums. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:00 am
Canada’s privacy commissioner calls for public input https://t.co/F0QrIueQzI -> Do customers really consent to how you use their data? [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:56 am
Now Google’s facing a second jury trial, and its only available defense is that its use of Java APIs is “fair use. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
The holdings of those "fair use" cases amounted to using a few bytes in a game and to making a few private (!) [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:37 pm
We believe that a good place to start would be to look at the adequacy of copyright limitations and exceptions in the digital and online environment, and in particular, the extent to which open, flexible and general copyright exceptions such as fair use are a more appropriate fit than closed list exceptions. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:49 am
Teixeira's use of the videos to criticize the mayor was a fair use. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:19 am
The 600 page document, initially designed to prepare codification of fair use down under, also managed to find room for recommendations including shorter copyright duration, stricter criteria for granting patents, and bypassing geoblocking restrictions. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:05 am
Following a Federal Circuit decision in 2014 holding that the Java API headers and structure, sequence, and organization, which Google copied, is protectable under copyright law, the litigation came back to the District Court this week for a jury to determine whether Google has a fair use defense. [read post]
