Search for: "Any and All Under-Tenants "
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
The Council replied in August 2009 making clear that it considered the house was under-occupied. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:37 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Court in all respects. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
(ii) assess charges against any member for any violation of the declaration or rules and regulations for which the member or his family members, tenants, guests, or other invitees are responsible. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:45 am
At this point, mention any reasonable restrictions you wish to make on the tenant’s ability to grant bare licences (take in genuine guests) over a long term. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:45 am
At this point, mention any reasonable restrictions you wish to make on the tenant’s ability to grant bare licences (take in genuine guests) over a long term. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:26 am
Under agency law it is the principal (in this case the landlord) who is liable for the acts done by his agent. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 1:16 am
I am not aware of any case law at all regarding assignment in this situation so all we can do is speculate. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
After all, tenants do not attend possession hearings on a regular basis on the strength of what their housing officer told them would happen (or not happen) at the hearing. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
After all, tenants do not attend possession hearings on a regular basis on the strength of what their housing officer told them would happen (or not happen) at the hearing. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 7:36 am
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 2:47 am
Only under rent arrears or suitable alternative accommodation can tenants be evicted. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:51 am
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
This statute requires that all owners, renovators, contractors and plumbers have to determine asbestos materials at a site prior to conducting any work. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:12 am
In support of his claim, Mr Street produced a ‘license agreement’ signed by Mrs Mountford which had the following wording: I understand and accept that a license in the above form does not and is not intended to give me a tenancy protected under the Rent Acts (The Rent Act 1977 which was in force at that time, made it difficult for landlords to evict tenants). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 8:37 am
The LVT, UT and CA all refused to grant dispensation (see our notes here and here). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 8:37 am
The LVT, UT and CA all refused to grant dispensation (see our notes here and here). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:10 am
Which means that all shared ownership leases qualify, regardless of the share held by the tenant. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:10 am
Which means that all shared ownership leases qualify, regardless of the share held by the tenant. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:28 pm
The problem, of course, was that the husband was being chased by a creditor holding a $600,000+ judgment, so any action he took with his assets would ultimately come under the judicial microscope. [read post]
