Search for: "Application of Smith" Results 3221 - 3240 of 7,622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Court again and again rejected their extreme demands, letting neutral and generally applicable laws stand, and then in Smith painted the big picture, explaining that while there is a long history of appropriate, permissive religious accommodation (think of the exemption for communion wine during Prohibition) in American law, history and the First Amendment do not mandate accommodation for a believer from neutral, generally applicable laws. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:05 pm by Edward Smith
Trauma to the Ocular Motor System I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento Eye Injury Attorney. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The February 11 Opinion In a February 11, 2016 opinion written for a unanimous three-judge panel by Senior Judge Inez Smith Reid, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals vacated the lower court’s ruling and remanded the case to the lower court for further proceedings. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Robert Whitman, Cameron Smith, and Meredith-Anne Kurz Former brokers of Fordham Financial Management will have to put this one in the “loss” column. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:52 am by Edward Smith
I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento medical malpractice lawyer. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
IPC did not allege intentional discrimination, but rather brought about a situation in which minority applicants were unable to secure the benefit of those credits throughout the Dallas metropolitan area. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 7:06 pm by Howard Friedman
Smith (1990) which rejected use of the "compelling interest" test to validate neutral regulations of general applicability that burden religious practices. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:21 am by Sarah Hiatt
Contact the Indigenous Food and Agriculture Initiative or visit the website for more information or an application. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
  He considered that the application for committal constituted a vendetta against Mr Smith and questioned whether in any event Sports Direct International would have suffered any loss from the alleged breaches. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:07 pm by Scot Hasselman and Nancy Halstead
Pawlitz (202-414-9233 or kpawlitz@reedsmith.com), Nancy Bonifant Halstead (202-414-9353 or nhalstead@reedsmith.com), or any other member of the Reed Smith Health Care Group with whom you work, if you would like additional information or if you have any questions. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:07 pm by Scot Hasselman and Nancy Halstead
Pawlitz (202-414-9233 or kpawlitz@reedsmith.com), Nancy Bonifant Halstead (202-414-9353 or nhalstead@reedsmith.com), or any other member of the Reed Smith Health Care Group with whom you work, if you would like additional information or if you have any questions. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:32 am
            This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am by John Eastman
That is not the “case by case” exercise of discretion that the courts have recognized; indeed, fewer than one percent of all applicants for the DACA/DAPA programs have been denied, and to my knowledge every single denial was based on the failure to meet the established criteria. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
[2] Rule 40 of the AAA allows the trial court to reopen the hearing: The hearing may be reopened on the arbitrator's initiative, or by the direction of the arbitrator upon application of a party, at any time before the award is made. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 3:54 pm by Edward Smith
Roseville Bucks for Bikes Roseville Bucks for Bikes Applications Underway for Roseville Bucks for Bikes I’m Ed Smith, a Roseville Personal Injury Attorney. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:12 pm by Edward Smith
Rocklin Bucks for Bikes I’m Ed Smith, a Rocklin personal injury attorney. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm by Jon Sands
  But this was an unreasonable application of the fundamental-fairness standard. [read post]