Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 3221 - 3240 of 5,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 9:39 am
So I can see preferring an "In Re" case over an "X v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am by royblack
The bright light of Gideon was barely flickering. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am by royblack
The bright light of Gideon was barely flickering. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:51 am by Richard J. Webb
He fairly describes the case as "a bare-knuckles contest pitting an expelled physician-shareholder of a large Long Island anesthesiology practice against the 11 other physician shareholders. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:51 am by Richard J. Webb
He fairly describes the case as "a bare-knuckles contest pitting an expelled physician-shareholder of a large Long Island anesthesiology practice against the 11 other physician shareholders. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:05 pm
Ele relatou que a “Operação Lei Seca” realiza 37 ações semanais, com a participação de vítimas de acidentes de trânsito, que percorrem bares, vias, universidades, escolas e empresas, conversando pessoalmente com as pessoas e distribuindo folhetos de conscientização sobre a impossibilidade de conciliar álcool com direção. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:05 pm
A previsão de punição dos comerciantes que vendem bebidas alcoólicas na beira das estradas foi a principal preocupação de Norton Luiz Lenhart, representante de três entidades patronais na audiência pública sobre a Lei Seca: Sindicato de Hotelaria e Gastronomia de Porto Alegre, Sindicato de Bares e Restaurantes do Espírito Santo e o Sindicato de Bares e Restaurantes de São Paulo. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:05 pm
Para ele, a concentração de álcool por litro de sangue definida pela Lei Seca (Lei 11.705/2008) – seis decigramas – é “razoável e justa” e deve ser mantida quando o Plenário julgar a Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI 4103) ajuizada contra a norma pela Associação Brasileira de Bares e Restaurantes (Abrasel). [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
” — this might qualify as either incitement of imminent criminal conduct, or as constitutionally unprotected solicitation of crime (see United States v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
This argument was given short shrift by Lord Neuberger who said that, in his opinion, it was wrong [73] and was not supported by the Strasbourg jurisprudence [74] Lord Neuberger’s conclusions were as follows: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been ‘commercial information or other intellectual property’ within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not ‘commercial… [read post]