Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C" Results 3221 - 3240 of 4,788
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Supreme Court agreed with the wife’s argument that the husband was not entitled to summary judgment since no judgment of divorce can be made unless and until the economic and custodial issues are determined or resolved by the parties. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
The woman did, however, admit to taking the car, which might open her up to liability for committing Grand Theft of a Motor Vehicle (commonly referred to as "Grand Theft Auto"), which is defined in Florida Statute 812.014(2)(c)(6). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:02 am by SHG
On May 27, 2009, FBI Special Agent Frederick C. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am by PaulKostro
” N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.12.[10] Even if a child is taken into protective custody — thereby removing the immediacy of the risk of harm — “[t]he entire period of protective custody shall not exceed 3 court days[,]” N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.19(c), and Title Nine mandates that “[c]ommencement of cases of child abuse or neglect must be the first order of priority in the [Superior Court, Chancery Division,] Family Part. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The Lord Advocate’s position was that Article 6 was only engaged, so that individual had a right to legal advice, where he was a suspect, in police custody, and the subject of police interrogation. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:41 am
Defendant’s stop for swerving was valid, and she consented to a search of the car producing over 1.9 kg of heroin. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:17 am
LEXIS 2724 (September 27, 2011)*: Appellant was in police custody prior to the search. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:48 pm by Lewis Gainor
Regardless of whether the firearm was loaded, the person possessing it did not have a Firearm Owner’s Identification Card (FOID). 720 ILCS 5/24-1.6(1)-(3)(C). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:20 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The appellant’s brief is available here. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
In opposition to plaintiff's contempt motion, NYU's Chief Information Security Officer stated that "[c]omputers that simply access the web through NYU's portal appear as a text file listing that is automatically written over every 30 days. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm by Susan Brenner
After their relationship ended in 2007, they went to court to resolve the issue of their daughter's custody. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:27 am by Jeff Gamso
  And it ain't going to be the lawyers from S & C. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:27 am by Bill Raftery
Michigan’s SB 701 appears to be the Senate version of HB 4769, which has gone nowhere since its June introduction. [read post]