Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
about the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 6:46 pm
This was soon followed by its use in Nuchatlaht v British Columbia, the first use of CaseLines in a chambers application, where the significant amount of documents were streamlined through the online cloud-based platform. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm
Lack of legal recognition for same-sex relationships again In Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine [2023] ECHR 442, the Fifth Section found that, in light of the Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova and Others, the absence of any legal recognition and protection for same-sex couples was a violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 8. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
Liptak notes that the Court's 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm
Regulation Best Interest is, in large part, a response to the highly-criticized Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule (the “DOL Fiduciary Rule”), which was vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on March 15, 2018 (see Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A., et al. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
This preamble leads to a note on Case C 553/11 Bernhard Rintisch v Klaus Eder, a ruling last Thursday from the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:55 am
In this week’s case (Nicholls v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:18 am
President Thomas V. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:43 pm
Neb., 262 U.S. 390 (1923); Bartels v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:15 am
v=84wCNVyWXPA&t=652s, accessed 3.9.2022). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:23 am
Four senators in the 47-member chamber declined to state their position. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
”4 Last year, in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
In parts of the United States, back alley abortions would then have remained common, and lunch counters segregated.But to Republicans today, defeating Bork was the original sin. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Precedents like Train v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Also, throw in Marbury v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:59 am
UN Human Rights CommitteeNjaru v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:26 am
And while we are on the topic, shame on the Michigan Chamber of Commerce for opposing this bill without stating why. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am
The Court found that the instance in question could be viewed as falling within the margin of appreciation accorded to member states: ‘the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the contracting states’ margin of appreciation’, referencing the Grand Chamber in Bărbulescu v Romania ([125]). [read post]
