Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Second, the contemporary practice of law in the United States is conducted largely in non-traditional environs, often with the use of sophisticated and highly mobile technologies. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:31 am
.; globalization, pressure on state from ability of individuals to communicate; ability to aggregage/disaggregate info in cloud culture, including Facebook; internet of things, RFID chips; network effects creating real winners and losers from being on or off the dominant system—all triggers for disintermediation. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
The other, more significant, event was the decision by the European Court of Human Rights in Austin v UK. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:51 pm
The Internal Struggle for Dominance Determines Our State of Health In relating these Hassidic concepts to healing and wellness in a modern world, we need to understand that the struggle for dominance between the intellect and emotion determines our state of health and influences the course and outcome of any disease. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
If, after all, "the power to tax is the power to destroy," why does the state have the power to tax/destroy anyone at all? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
The relevant norms are extracted below :-"(v) In the matter of sale of public property, the dominant consideration is to secure the best price for the property to be sold. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
On Justia's Verdict today, you can read the second of a two-part series in which I analyze the Supreme Court's recent decision in Howes v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:59 pm
See Seacoast Builders Corp. v Rutgers, State Univ., 358 N.J. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:58 am
The IPKat has an acute dislike of legal actions that look destined to fail and which unnecessarily prolong the state of hostilities between the parties. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Media law news this week was dominated by the Tulisa privacy injunction and the long-awaited judgment in Flood v Times Newspapers. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
One v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Debates over the constitutionality of the individual mandate dominate the coverage. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
That ruling came a year after the Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:48 pm
See below: Main Topic Republicans, Democrats and Voter ID (12:07PM) In 16 states, Repubican-dominated legislatures have tightened access to the polls. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm
v=wall Twitter: @rep_stevewomack Congressional District 4 Rep. [read post]
