Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 8,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 9:54 am
In evaluating a Title IX private cause of action against a school, courts use the test set forth in Davis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
This second appeal–United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:29 pm
The facts of Fort Bend County v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
. - I was also happy to see that, even though this case is from San Diego, neither of the two lowest names on the briefs (and hence the ones presumptively most responsible for it) from the AG's office were from USD, and were instead Marvin Mizell (from Davis) and Maxine Cutler (from Golden Gate). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:26 am
And the "book" that she's allegedly planning to write will probably look a little like this.So I don't think the world's missing much as a result of Justice Davis' ruling that she doesn't get a looksie.P.S. - I didn't realize it when I originally wrote this, but apparently this is not Ms. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:23 am
Judge Gregory and Judge Davis wrote separate opinions concurring in that judgment. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:07 am
Monday, March 21, 2011 09-11328 DAVIS, WILLIE G. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am
”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:43 am
Moriber v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 pm
Polling Issue The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit issued an opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
Texas Rule of Evidence 609(d) provides that Evidence of juvenile adjudications is not admissible, except for proceedings conducted pursuant to Title III, Family Code, in which the witness is a party, under this rule unless required to be admitted by... [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
BURNS V. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:26 am
" Reck v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:54 am
In ClearValue v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:48 am
Davis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
Lady Justice ArdenAs Lady Justice Arden pointed out in her leading judgment, Gallarotti v Sebastianelli [2012] EWCA Civ 865 did not require the Court of Appeal to decide any new law: "Nonetheless, this appeal may be of wide interest as the factual paradigm is not uncommon. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:30 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
