Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 12,262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2019, 4:34 am
In Flagg v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
By hypothesis, I would not have acted any differently had I realized (through clearer drafting) that the penalty was as long as it was.Do I think that the void for vagueness doctrine should therefore shrink to account for such cases? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Robart, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit), and Huawei v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The text has taken several forms, but currently members of Congress swear as follows: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on… [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm
Rosania v Gluck As far as I know, the first case to raise that lurking question post-Raharney is Rosania v Gluck, 2019 NY Slip Op 32087(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 8, 2019], decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:03 am
The HBO documentary "I Love You, Now Die: The Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 2:03 am
How much does it cost to fight a Drug Possession For Trafficking Purposes Charge? [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:10 am
How did a story like this ever get through? [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
As a result, they cannot obtain subsidized insurance, either through Medicaid or through the marketplace. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
In Katz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:23 am
Under Satava v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
” That part of the decision is what will be cited by the Justice Department in defending future exercises of executive discretion—and it should be. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:05 am
” In Meyer v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
I posed the same question to the ACA's most ardent defenders, including Obama administration officials. [read post]
