Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 3221 - 3240 of 5,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
It ruled that Dial-A-Mattress could establish secondary meaning in connection with its application for the mark 1-888-M-A-T-R-E-S-S, based upon the acquired distinctiveness of its legally equivalent mark (212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S (shown above). [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The parties disputed the extent to which the ads, coupons, and website for the product focused on pomegranates. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 7:42 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/505(a)(1) That schedule can be found here. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In all of these cases, the government has lost this argument.It is not at all surprising that since Preseault I, 494 U.S. 1 (1990), and Preseault II, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:54 pm
" Instead, the court cites Tiffany and Designer Skin for the proposition that keyword advertising on third party trademarks does not automatically create an implied sponsorship or affiliation. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am by Ashwin Sharma
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments by any of the following methods: Persons with access to the Internet may view this notice and submit comments by going to the regulations.gov Web site at: http:/ /www.regulations.gov/index.cfm. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 2:25 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
§ 891.41(1)(a)), the child’s parents are your friend and her husband. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
The CCPA, which goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2020, requires companies to engage in 18 more months of data flow analysis and regulatory compliance. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:53 am by Cinthia Macie
”[14]  A “third-party store could likely provide game distribution at a lower commission and thereby either drive down prices or increase developer profits. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:52 am by Thomas Kaufman
  Or, as the Supreme Court put it: "It is one thing to expect regulated parties to conform their conduct to an agency’s interpretations once the agency announces them; it is quite another to require regulated parties to divine the agency’s interpretations in advance or else be held liable when the agency announces its interpretations for the first time in an enforcement proceeding and demands deference. [read post]